PLENARY COUNCIL PRAYER
Come, Holy Spirit of the great South Land.
O God, bless and unite all your people in Australia
and guide us on the pilgrim way of the Plenary Council.
Give us the grace to see your face in one another
and to recognise Jesus, our companion on the road.
Give us the courage to tell our stories and to speak boldly of your truth.
Give us ears to listen humbly to each other
and a discerning heart to hear what you are saying.
Lead your Church into a hope-filled future,
that we may live the joy of the Gospel.
Through Jesus Christ our Lord, bread for the journey from age to age.
Amen.
Our Lady Help of Christians, pray for us.
St Mary MacKillop, pray for us.
Heavenly Father, We thank you for gathering us together
and calling us to serve as your disciples. You have charged us through Your Son, Jesus, with the great mission of evangelising and witnessing your love to the world. Send your Holy Spirit to guide us as we discern your will for the spiritual renewal of our parish. Give us strength, courage, and clear vision
as we use our gifts to serve you. We entrust our parish family to the care of Mary, our mother,and ask for her intercession and guidance
as we strive to bear witness to the Gospel and build an amazing parish.Amen.Our Parish Sacramental Life Baptism: Arrangements are made by contacting Parish Office. Parents attend a Baptismal Preparation Session organised with a Priest. Reconciliation, Confirmation and Eucharist: Are received following a Family–centred, Parish-based, School-supported Preparation Program. Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults: prepares adults for reception into the Catholic community. Marriage: arrangements are made by contacting one of our priests - couples attend a Pre-marriage Program Anointing of the Sick: please contact one of our priests Reconciliation: BY APPOINTMENT ONLY
THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC ACTIVITIES ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICEEucharistic Adoration Devonport, Benediction with Adoration Devonport, Legion of Mary,
DAILY AND SUNDAY MASS ONLINE: Please go to the following link on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MLCP1Sun 16th Aug Devonport 10:00am – ALSO LIVESTEAMMon 17th Aug No Mass Tues 18th Aug Devonport 9:30am - ALSO LIVESTEAMWed 19th Aug Ulverstone 9:30am ... St John EudesThurs 20th Aug Devonport 12noon ... St Bernard – ALSO LIVESTEAMFri 21st Aug Ulverstone 9:30am ... St Pius XSat 22nd Aug Ulverstone 6.00pm ... The Queenship of the Blessed Virgin MarySun 23rd Aug Ulverstone 10:00amIf you are looking for Sunday Mass readings or Daily Mass readings, Universalis has the readings as well as the various Hours of the Divine Office - https://universalis.com/mass.htm
and calling us to serve as your disciples.
as we use our gifts to serve you.
as we strive to bear witness
May the souls of the faithful departed,
through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen
PREGO REFLECTION ON TODAY’S GOSPEL:
PREGO REFLECTION ON TODAY’S GOSPEL:
In preparation for my prayer, I may like to look back over the last week, reflecting on the times when I have been aware of the presence of God in my life, and the moments when I have felt far from God.
Placing these before the Lord, I take a few long, deep breaths.
I then allow my breath to find its own soothing rhythm.
I slowly read the passage several times, until it becomes familiar to me.
Imagining the sights and sounds surrounding this unexpected meeting, I now try to picture the dialogue between the woman, Jesus and his disciples.
Perhaps I place myself as a bystander … or as one of the key figures.
What do I notice about the emotions and actions of each person?
I may spend time wondering what it felt like for the desperate mother.
Who seems to demonstrate most compassion by their actions?
I ponder what this scene teaches me about the mystery of God’s message of love.
How is this love found and expressed amongst people of very different faith and belief from my own?
Within my imagination, I sit down with Jesus and share my thoughts and feelings with him as I would with a dear friend.
I close my prayer by saying together with Jesus, Our Father ...
Mersey Leven Parish would like to Congratulate
Fr Mike on his 45th Anniversary of Ordination to the Priesthood Thursday 20th August.
The whole parish is deeply grateful to him for his friendship, support and ministry, among us.
We all hope you enjoy the next two weeks of holiday leave (well deserved)!!
We hope you had a great day Ricky!!
Weekly Ramblings
Although I am much better – thankfully not having Shingles – my body is telling me that I need to have a break and so I will be away from the Parish from Monday, returning for Saturday, 29th August. This means that we will retain the current Mass program for the next three weeks and look to make any additions and/or changes from the 1st weekend of September. Thank you for being patient.
This week I will be celebrating my 45th Anniversary of Priesthood. Sadly, I will not be here in the Parish, but I will be celebrating Mass on that day in thanksgiving for the gift of Priesthood and for the many people and the different parishes who have been part of my journey. An important part of my journey has been the friendships and support I have received over these years.
During the week one of my close friends, Fr Mick Wheeler, died in Melbourne and it was a time when I stopped and thought back through the years of my journey. I chatted with two of my seminarian classmates and shared some of the stories of our journey together and separately with laughter and sadness – and the awareness that like so many others at this time there is no physical opportunity to say our farewell. May he rest in peace.
Thanks to all those are continuing to support the Parish through their regular giving – whether it is by now placing their envelopes in the basket at Mass or who have been making their contribution online. It is a tribute to your generosity and your witness that we have been supported during this difficult time.
Even though the Covid case on the NW Coast is a transferred case we need only look to NZ where numbers are increasing without a new case arriving – investigations are ongoing as to how this has happened. We will continue to take every precaution to ensure that people are kept safe – please maintain social distancing even if it doesn’t seem necessary; maintain hand sanitising protocols; let us know when you are coming to Mass so that we can maintain a contact register to ensure everyone’s ongoing well-being.
The Great Commandment tells us – Love God and love one another – we can do that by caring about what others need, not just what I want and respecting their choices about personal safety and social distancing.
Stay safe and stay sane, and if you don’t really need to, stay at home – it’s generally warmer there anyway.
To continue supporting the Parish you can...
· Drop your contribution into the Parish Office during our usual office hours (Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 10am -3pm)
· Make an electronic transfer of funds directly into the CDF – Commonwealth Bank Account Name: Mersey Leven; BSB: 067 000; Acc No: 1031 5724 and in the description simply add your name and/or envelope number thank you.
· Place envelopes and/or loose money in the giving basket at the entrance of Church on weekends.
HOMILY by Richard Leonard
One bright Sunday morning, everyone in the town got up early and went to the local church. Before Mass started, the townspeople were sitting in their pews and talking about their lives, their families.
Suddenly, Satan appeared at the front of the church. Everyone started screaming and running for the front entrance, trampling each other in a frantic effort to get away from the devil incarnate. Soon everyone was evacuated from the Church, except for one elderly lady who sat calmly in her pew, not moving, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Satan was in her presence.
Now this confused Satan a bit, so he walked up to the older lady and said, ‘Don't you know who I am?’
The woman replied, ‘I sure do.’
Satan asked, ‘Aren't you afraid of me?’
‘No, certainly not’ said the woman.
Satan was a little perturbed at this and queried, ‘Why aren't you afraid of me?’
The woman calmly replied, ‘Because I’ve been married to your brother for 48 years.’
Until quite recently in many cultures around the world events or experiences that had no ready explanation were put down to evil forces. This was certainly true in Jesus’ day. Diseases, physical deformities, mental illnesses, accidents, bad weather patterns and defeats in battle were attributed either to God’s vengeance or the work of a demon. Although we no longer hold this to be true, we still hear this line from some people today.
The Syro-Phoenician woman considers herself cursed for having a daughter who is tormented by a demon. It is very unlikely that her daughter is possessed by the devil. She probably had a chronic illness that could not be cured. Furthermore, the woman is also considered cursed by others because she is a Gentile, a non-Jew. In fact this story is unsettling and rather unflattering to Jesus on several levels.
Because of her ethnicity and religion the disciples do not think she should ask for anything from Jesus. He seems to concur with them. If it wasn’t for the woman’s courage and persistence, she would never have got what she wanted. And by Jesus referring to them as dogs, he seems to agree with the contempt with which the Jews held the Gentiles.
Again it is the woman’s quick wit and faith which turns the situation around. She domesticates the racial slur and argues that if she is to be considered a dog she is not a wild one but of the house variety where she should be able to enjoy the leftovers. The power of her insight and the rightness of her cause catches Jesus off-guard, her daughter is healed and everyone is taught a lesson about how the Kingdom of God breaks through in the most extraordinary ways.
This story also tells us of the power of intercessory prayer. The woman goes through her ordeal not for herself but for her daughter. Her faith in Jesus is the vehicle by which someone else’s life is enriched. So too for us. As Christians many of us regularly tell others, whom we know are in need, that we will pray for them. Often these people, some who do not share our faith, are touched by this kindness.
When we make our prayer intercessory, either at home or in the Prayer of the Faithful at Mass, it can be our finest hour. We can learn a lot about a parish from its intercessions. It can be the time when we forget about ourselves and our needs for a while and ask for the needs of someone else, even if we don’t know them. This type of prayer has the possibility of helping us place our lives in context and reminding us that while we have a seat at the world’s table, others are at our feet scavenging for scraps.
The best prayer reminds us that we have to get down and get dirty and work to raise up all of God’s children to the places of honour which everyone deserves.
Depriving the Christian faithful of their right to Word and Sacraments
- Robert Mickens, Rome, August 14, 2020.
This article is from the La-Croix International website - you can access the site here but complete full access is via paid subscriptionOriginally published Feb. 20, 2020.
What's the greatest threat to the Roman Catholic Church today – a schism? Or the rise in power of fundamentalist clericalists?
José María Castillo, himself a priest, believes it's the latter.
The 90-year-old Spaniard was one of the most influential theologians in Latin America and elsewhere during the first couple of decades following the Second Vatican Council (1962-65). His books, published in the dozens, were mandatory reading in many Spanish-speaking seminaries and universities immediately after the Council.
Then they weren't.
Not long after his election in 1978, John Paul II put the brakes on the push for further ecclesial reform (as theologians like Castillo were advocating) and began his restorationist project of carefully narrowing the interpretation and application of the Vatican II documents.
One way the Polish pope did this was by appointing compliant and doctrinally conservative (and unimaginative) bishops. They, in turn, with the support of the Vatican's doctrinal office, began silencing and marginalizing theologians like Castillo.
A return of the early post-Vatican II theologiansThese theologians have found a new lease on their ecclesial lives since Jorge Mario Bergoglio SJ was elected Bishop of Rome in 2013.
The man we now call Pope Francis, even without any formal writ of rehabilitation, has allowed them to begin contributing again to the discussions, debates and process of discernment that his pontificate has re-introduced in the Church.
It is nothing short of amazing how much the atmosphere inside the Church has changed in just seven years.
Archbishop Piero Marini, the longtime Vatican official most identified with the post-conciliar liturgical reforms, said just after Francis' election that we had been "breathing the air of a swamp."
Unfortunately, the Argentine pope, who is famous even beyond Church circles for being one of the world's most outspoken defenders of the environment, has not been able to completely clean up the old, stifling atmosphere within centralized Catholicism.
There are priests, bishops and cardinals in places of influence and power – in Rome and abroad – who are doing everything they can to stop the 83-year-old pope from making any changes that might threaten their clericalist privileges.
The clericalists strike backAnd one of the sinister methods they are using to try halt him in his tracks is to constantly raise the specter of a Church schism.
Some commentators believe this was at least a factor in the pope's decision not to mention, in his recent exhortation on the Amazon, the issue of married priests and women deacons.
"At the Vatican the ideas and interests of the cardinals, bishops and monsignors that represent the conservative clergy far outweigh the deprived needs of the hundreds of thousands of Catholics who live in the Amazon region," José María Castillo has observed.
In an article published Feb. 17 on the site Religión Digital, he said the threat posed by the continued, lopsided influence of such clericalists is much more serious than any possible schism.
And the reason is simple. The clericalists, just a miniscule part of the 1.2 billion-member Church, are seriously violating the rights of the Catholic faithful.
Castillo cited paragraph 37 of Lumen gentium, the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church."The laity have the right, as do all Christians, to receive in abundance from their spiritual shepherds the spiritual goods of the Church, especially the assistance of the word of God and of the sacraments," that Vatican II text says.
The obligation to feed God's peopleWith every right there is an obligation. And here it is the obligation and responsibility of the Church's spiritual pastors (first and foremost its bishops) to provide the Catholic people with the sacraments.
But the bishops are not doing that in the Amazon. Nor are they doing it in many other places of the world where there are not enough ordained presbyters to lead Eucharistic celebrations – i.e. to validly consecrate the hosts.
"It is a pressing obligation of Church authority to adequately respond to this right of the faithful," Castillo wrote.
"It's a duty the pope must respond to despite the arguments and interests of the fundamentalist and conservative clergy," he continued.
"In the Church of the early centuries every community had the recognized right to elect its ministers. And even the right to remove them when the ministers' behavior was not in conformity with their mission," he noted.
He cited the acts from a synod held in Spain in the 3rd century to show that even Rome upheld this right. And, thus, the Church consisted in the community more than in the clergy.
Priorities upside downBut today, he said, the situation is totally reversed.
"That which is imposed is what's in the interest and convenience of the clergy, even when that leads to the religious and evangelical abandonment of hundreds of thousands of Catholics," he wrote.
"It's extremely important to underline very clearly that this situation will only be resolved when two, ever more pressing decisions are made: 1.) allow the presbyteral ordination of married men; 2.) establish equal rights for men and women in the Church," he said.
The bishops should not wait for the pope to do this. Nor should they expect him to do so, at least not on his own.
They can take action now to fulfill their responsibility to provide their people with the sacraments, especially the Eucharist. The first step is to formally petition the pope to allow the ordination of married men.
The legal way forwardThe bishops at the Synod assembly on the Amazon "proposed" this, but – technically – they did use the canonical language over which people like Cardinal Baldisseri love to split hairs.
In fact, there is a canonical process that a bishop or conference of bishops (or perhaps a Synod assembly) can follow to request the ordination of married men.
The Code of Canon Law actually foresees this possibility.
While it states that "a man who has a wife" is simply impeded from receiving holy orders (Can. 1042, no. 1), it also says – quite specifically – that the Holy See can dispense of this impediment (cf. Can. 1047 § 2, no. 3).
We often say it's easier to get what you want if you ask nicely.
In the Catholic Church – yes, also in the pontificate of Pope Francis – it's even better if you ask "canonically."
A Minority Position
This article is taken from the Daily Email sent by Fr Richard Rohr OFM from the Center for Action and Contemplation. You can subscribe to receive the email by clicking here
The best criticism of the bad is the practice of the better.
Oppositional energy only creates more of the same. —One of the Center for
Action & Contemplation’s Eight Core Principles [1]
Throughout history, the Franciscan School has typically been
a minority position inside of the Roman Catholic and larger Christian
tradition. While not everyone shares our way of thinking, it has never been
condemned or considered heretical—in fact quite the opposite. It has been
allowed and affirmed because we simply emphasize different teachings of Jesus,
offer new perspectives and behaviors, and focus on the full and final
implications of the incarnation of God in Christ. (I’m not sure why that puts
us in the minority of Christians, but so be it!) For Franciscans, the
incarnation is not just about Jesus but is manifested everywhere. Once we learn
how to see spiritually, “The whole world is our cloister!” in the words of St.
Francis himself. [2]
From the very beginning, Franciscanism was sort of a
para-church on the edge of the inside of organized Christianity, similar to
others who had occupied that same position: desert fathers and mothers, many
early monastics before they become clericalized and domesticated, Celtic
Christianity, and even some religious orders down to our own time. Most
Catholics are accustomed to such groups living on the side and the edge of the
parish church system, but this is also why Francis of Assisi has often been
called “the first Protestant.”
But how did Francis do what he did, from the inside and
without oppositional energy? Francis’
starting place was human suffering instead of human sinfulness and God’s
identification with that suffering in Jesus. That did not put him in conflict
with any Catholic dogmas or structures, merely to the side of them. His Christ
was universal while also deeply personal, his cathedral was creation itself, he
preferred the bottom of society to the top. Francis showed us that practical
truth is more likely found at the bottom and the edges than at the top or the
center of most groups, institutions, and cultures (another one of the Center’s
Core Principles).
Since Jesus himself was humble and poor, then the pure and
simple imitation of Jesus became Francis’ life agenda. He was a fundamentalist,
not about doctrinal Scriptures, but about lifestyle Scriptures: take nothing
for your journey; eat what is set before you; work for your wages; wear no
shoes. This is still revolutionary thinking for most Christians, although it is
the very “marrow of the Gospel,” to use Francis’ own phrase. [3] He knew
intuitively what many educators have now proven—that humans tend to live
themselves into new ways of thinking more than think themselves into new ways
of living (yet another Core Principle). The lecture method changes very few
people at any deep or long-lasting level. It normally does not touch the
unconscious, where all our hurts and motives lie hidden and disguised.
We no longer understand melancholy. Today we lump all forms of melancholy together into one indiscriminate bundle and call it “depression”. While a lot of good is being done by psychiatrists, psychologists, and the medical profession in terms of treating depression, something important is being lost at the same time. Melancholy is much more than what we call “depression”. For better and for worse, the ancients saw melancholy as a gift from God.
Prior to modern psychology and psychiatry, melancholy was seen precisely as a gift from the divine. In Greek mythology, it even had its own god, Saturn, and it was seen as a rich but mixed gift. On one hand, it could bring soul-crushing emotions such as unbearable loneliness, paralyzing obsessions, inconsolable grief, cosmic sadness, and suicidal despair; on the other hand, it could also bring depth, genius, creativity, poetic inspiration, compassion, mystical insight, and wisdom.
No more. Today melancholy has even lost its name and has become, in the words of Lyn Cowan, a Jungian analyst, “clinicalized, pathologized, and medicalized” so that what poets, philosophers, blues singers, artists, and mystics have forever drawn on for depth is now seen as a “treatable illness” rather than as a painful part of the soul that doesn’t want treatment but wants instead to be listened to because it intuits the unbearable heaviness of things, namely, the torment of human finitude, inadequacy and mortality. For Cowan, modern psychology’s preoccupation with symptoms of depression and its reliance on drugs in treating depression show an “appalling superficiality in the face of real human suffering.” For her, apart from whatever else this might mean, refusing to recognize the depth and meaning of melancholy is demeaning to the sufferer and perpetrates a violence against a soul that is already in torment.
And that is the issue when dealing with suicide. Suicide is normally the result of a soul in torment and in most cases that torment is not the result of a moral failure but of a melancholy which overwhelms a person at a time when he or she is too tender, too weak, too wounded, too stressed, or too biochemically impaired to withstand its pressure. Leo Tolstoy, the Russian novelist, who eventually did die by suicide, had written earlier about the melancholic forces that sometimes threatened to overwhelm him. Here’s one of his diary entries: “the force which drew me away from life was fuller, more powerful, and more general than any mere desire. It was a force like my old aspiration to live, only it impelled me in the opposite direction. It was an aspiration of my whole being to get out of life.’”
There’s still a lot we don’t understand about suicide and that misunderstanding isn’t just psychological, it’s also moral. In short, we generally blame the victim: If your soul is sick, it’s your fault. For the most part that is how people who die by suicide are judged. Even though publicly we have come a long way in recent times in understanding suicide and now claim to be more open and less judgmental morally, the stigma remains. We still have not made the same peace with breakdowns in mental health as we have made with breakdowns in physical health. We don’t have the same psychological and moral anxieties when someone dies of cancer, stroke, or heart attack as we do when someone dies by suicide. Those who die by suicide are, in effect, our new “lepers”.
In former times when there was no solution for leprosy other than isolating the person from everyone else, the victim suffered doubly, once from the disease and then (perhaps even more painfully) from the social isolation and debilitating stigma. He or she was declared “unclean” and had to own that stigma. But the person suffering from leprosy still had the consolation of not being judged psychologically or morally. They were not judged to be “unclean” in those areas. They were pitied.
However, we only feel pity for those whom we haven’t ostracized, psychologically and morally. That’s why we judge rather than pity someone who dies by suicide. For us, death by suicide still renders persons “unclean” in that it puts them outside of what we deem as morally and psychologically acceptable. Their deaths are not spoken of in the same way as other deaths. They are doubly judged, psychologically (If your soul is sick, it’s your own fault) and morally (Your death is a betrayal). To die by suicide is worse than dying of leprosy.
I’m not sure how we can move past this. As Pascal says, the heart has its reasons. So too does the powerful taboo inside us that militates against suicide. There are good reasons why we spontaneously feel the way we do about suicide. But, perhaps a deeper understanding of the complexity of forces that lie inside of what we naively label “depression” might help us understand that, in most cases, suicide may not be judged as a moral or psychological failure, but as a melancholy that has overpowered a suffering soul.
The Hiddenness of Priestly Life
‘In the daily rhythm of receiving and being given, the priest allows himself to be shaped by the ebb and flow of grace, alive in the rhythm of the Spirit breathing in him.’ James Hanvey SJ describes how the life of a priest is shaped by the relationships to which he is committed, yet is characterised always by the mysterious surrender of himself to the life of the Church.
Fr James Hanvey SJ is Superior of the Jesuit Community at Farm Street, London and lecturer in Systematic Theology at Heythrop College, University of London.
Taken from Priesthood: A life open to Christ compiled by Canon Daniel P. Cronin, St Paul Publications 2009, ISBN 978-0854397624, pp. 144-146.
This article is taken from the ThinkingFaith.org website where you can find a wide range of articles by clicking here
When things are in transition and the old certainties, languages and systems seem to be dissolving, the question of identity becomes a recurring anxiety. Although the sacrament of priesthood confers its own immutable character, identity is always worked out in a context, in a community, in relationships. As these change then so will the experience of ministry and its range. In this situation identity will appear unstable and meaning difficult to establish with confidence. Yet, in an odd way the immutable character of the sacrament of priesthood commits the priest to these relationships in all their fluidity – relationships he does not choose but is given; relationships that he cannot simply shake off.
Even when such relationships are at their most painful, somehow they continue to shape and determine a life, a ministry, a way of being. The sacrament does not remove the priest from the world, from the lives of the people he is called to serve, from the Church that walks the rough path of history, living with generosity and love in cultures that are hostile or simply uncomprehending. Instead it commits him more completely and more insistently to live in all these realities. Always in his life is the dynamic of the incarnation. It carries him beyond himself into the depths of the world, the secret places of the human heart and the human dream and, of course, the brokenness of both.
He lives there, with his people, knowing the poverty of his own resources; the daily encounter with his fragility and the many things he does not know, the answers he does not have. In these moments he can only trust to the future – not so much a time but a person whom he has come to know and love as his Lord. He lives with the struggle, with the pull to withdraw – just a little – to take control and to measure out his energy, choose his paths and find his resting places. He knows that he was not called for his strengths but for his weakness. He knows that those consoling words of Paul, that God’s strength is perfected in his weakness, are not empty words. But when he has to drink from the cup of weakness or eat the bread of his loneliness, when the drag of routine can almost hollow out any strong sense of identity that has life, it is not easy to live these things as a real grace, a real moment of meeting with the God who has called him. But if he does not give in to fear, rush into activity or find some theology or spirituality that will offer comfort and security, if he can hand himself over to the faith the Church has in him and remain faithful to the sacrament at the centre of his life, something begins to disclose itself. Slowly, over a lifetime, he does not discover an answer but an act, a way of being. It is a way of being hidden.
Our culture makes us want to know who we are. It commands us to ‘be ourselves’, to be the masters and makers of our lives; this is the ultimate freedom. But the priest is not self-made; all he has, he has received. This is the mystery at the centre of his life and in every moment he is ‘given’, handed over. He remains an enigma to himself, a puzzle, because he can never be in command of the sacrament that has now claimed him; the One who has made his home in him. All he can do is receive himself from the sacrament which is effective in every minute of his life whatever his situation or condition.
As a priest, his life moves in the very opposite direction of ‘sovereign self’. In the very moment of receiving himself he can only let go, let himself be given. Given in all those small and unnoticed ways; in the ordinariness of sacraments which he celebrates for God’s people, in the prayers he says, sometimes badly and distractedly; in all the lives he touches, sometimes absentmindedly, sometimes with love and insight and care; and in those hidden moments when someone opens their life to him in its pain and despair, its guilt and its shame, when somehow he finds a word or maybe no word, but his presence is an unacknowledged healing. So, in all this daily rhythm of receiving and being given he allows himself to be shaped by the ebb and flow of grace, alive in the rhythm of the Spirit breathing in him. He allows himself to be lost in the life of the Church. He gives himself to the unsung gestures of love and he recognises that on some days, just on some days, he might understand a little of their beauty and their mystery.
Occasionally, if he’s attentive and faithful to the rhythms of this sacrament that has become his life, he might begin to glimpse a form, another life that moves within his own without which he would have no life. He might recognise the One in whose life his own lies immersed and hidden. And when he comes each day to say those simple words, not his own words but the words he has been given, he knows he is in the school of love. ‘Take and receive…’ Not just words but an act; an act which he knows he can never fathom or exhaust. Here, pronounced and performed, he is born to himself and to Christ and to his people. He will know the Life he carries; the joy, even in sacrifice and surrender, of being poured out and given away. In these words which he is given to speak, his life has become a Eucharist; a ‘yes’ which he says yet knows is always beyond him, ‘Take and receive.’ Here, in this act, all the hidden surrenders gather into Love, into Christ, and he knows whose identity he carries. He knows himself in living this life beyond his own.
Take Lord, and receive
All my liberty, my memory, my understanding,
and my entire will,
all I have and possess. You have given all to me.
To you, Lord, I return it.
All is yours, dispose of it wholly according
to your will.
Give me your love and your grace, for this is
sufficient for me.
(St Ignatius of Loyola, Spiritual Exercises 234)
Taken from Priesthood: A life open to Christ compiled by Canon Daniel P. Cronin, St Paul Publications 2009, ISBN 978-0854397624, pp. 144-146.
No comments:
Post a Comment