Mersey Leven Catholic Parish
Resident Seminarian: Br Chris Mendoza
Mob: 0408 389 216
chris_mendoza2080@yahoo.com
Postal Address: PO Box 362, Devonport
Parish Office:
(Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday 10am - 3pm)
Secretary: Annie Davies / Anne Fisher
Pastoral Council Chair: Jenny Garnsey
Pastoral Council Chair: Jenny Garnsey
Parish Mass Times: mlcpmasstimes.blogspot.com.au
Weekly Homily Podcast: mikedelaney.podomatic.com
Parish Magazine: mlcathparishnewsletter.blogspot.com.au
Year of Mercy Blogspot: mlcpyom.blogspot.com.au
Parish Prayer
Heavenly Father,
We thank you for gathering us together
and calling us to serve as your disciples.
and calling us to serve as your disciples.
You have charged us through Your Son, Jesus, with the great mission
of evangelising and witnessing your love to the world.
Send your Holy Spirit to guide us as we discern your will
for the spiritual renewal of our parish.
Give us strength, courage, and clear vision
as we use our gifts to serve you.
as we use our gifts to serve you.
We entrust our parish family to the care of Mary, our mother,
and ask for her intercession and guidance
as we strive to bear witness
as we strive to bear witness
to the Gospel and build an amazing parish.
Amen.
Our Parish Sacramental Life
Baptism: Parents are asked to contact the Parish Office to make arrangements for attending a Baptismal Preparation Session and booking a Baptism date.
Reconciliation, Confirmation and Eucharist: Are received following a Family–centred, Parish-based, School-supported Preparation Program.
Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults: prepares adults for reception into the Catholic community.
Marriage: arrangements are made by contacting one of our priests - couples attend a Pre-marriage Program
Anointing of the Sick: please contact one of our priests
Reconciliation: Ulverstone - Fridays (10am - 10:30am)
Devonport - Saturday (5:15pm – 5:45pm)
Penguin - Saturday (5:15pm - 5:45pm)
Care and Concern: If you are aware of anyone who is in need of assistance and has given permission to be contacted by Care and Concern, please phone the Parish Office.
|
Weekday Masses 8th - 11th November, 2016
Tuesday: 9:30am
Penguin
Wednesday: 9:30am Latrobe
Thursday: 10:30am Eliza Purton … St Leo the Great
12noon Devonport
Friday: 9:30am Ulverstone … St Martin of Tours
Mass Times Next Weekend 12th & 13th November
2016
Saturday Vigil: 6:00pm Penguin
Devonport
Sunday Mass: 8:30am Port Sorell
9:00am
Ulverstone
10:30am
Devonport
11:00am
Sheffield
5:00pm Latrobe
Every
Friday 10am - 12noon, concluding with Stations of the Cross and Angelus
Devonport: Benediction with Adoration - first Friday of
each month.
Legion of Mary: Sacred Heart Church Community Room,
Ulverstone, Wednesdays, 11am
Christian Meditation:
Devonport, Emmaus House - Wednesdays 7pm.
Prayer Group:
Charismatic Renewal
Devonport, Emmaus House - Thursdays 7.00pm
Meetings, with Adoration and Benediction are held each
Second Thursday of the Month in OLOL Church, commencing at 7.00 pm
Ministry Rosters 12th & 13th November, 2016
Readers: Vigil: A McIntyre, M Williams, C Kiely-Hoye
10:30am F Sly, J Tuxworth
Ministers of Communion: Vigil B & B
Windebank, T Bird,
J Kelly, R Baker, B Windebank
10.30am: S Riley, M Sherriff, R Beaton, M O’Brien-Evans,
D
& M Barrientos
Cleaners 11th Nov: G & R O’Rourke, M & R Youd
18th Nov: K.S.C.
Piety Shop 12th Nov: R McBain 13th Nov: P Piccolo
Ulverstone:
Readers: B
O’Rourke, J Pisarskis
Ministers of Communion: M Mott, M Fennell, L Hay, T Leary
Cleaners: V
Ferguson, E Cox Flowers: M Webb Hospitality:
M McLaren
Penguin:
Greeters: G Hills-Eade, B Eade Commentator: J Barker Readers: E Nickols, A Landers
Ministers of
Communion: S Ewing,
J Garnsey
Liturgy: Sulphur Creek J Setting Up: S Ewing Care of Church: M Murray, E Nickols
Latrobe:
Reader: S Ritchie, P Marlow Ministers of Communion: M Eden, M Kavic
Procession: Parishioners, J Hyde
Port Sorell:
Readers: D Leaman, T Jeffries Ministers of
Communion: P
Anderson Clean/Flow/Prepare: C Howard
Readings this Week: 32nd Sunday in Ordinary Time – Year C
First Reading: 2 Maccabees 7:1-2, 9-14
Second Reading: 2 Thessalonians 12:16 – 3:5
Gospel: Luke 20:27-38
When I come to pray I make sure I give myself enough time
to allow his Word to touch my heart.
I read it several times asking the Lord to help me understand something of the deeper meaning of this text.
The Sadducees ask Jesus a question which concerns one of their core beliefs: the reality of the resurrection.
I too may have uncertainties or queries about my own beliefs.
Who do I usually turn to?
Have I felt able to speak to the Lord about them?
I consider my answers and the reasons behind them Jesus replies to the Sadducees’ question.
I try to imagine the tone of his voice: is he annoyed, irritated, patient, resigned and loving or...?
Like them he uses Scripture.
I ponder: How much do I rely on Scripture to support my beliefs, to speak to others about what is important to me?
I tell the Lord how I feel about this and ask for his help if need be.
Perhaps I now stay with his assurance of eternal life.
This may lead me to reflect on people close to me who have gone to the Lord.
Is his promise able to bring me some comfort?
I tell the Lord what is in my heart.
When the time comes, I slowly bring my prayer to an end thanking him for any insights he has given me. If I can, a little later, I might want to jot down a few notes about this time of prayer.
I read it several times asking the Lord to help me understand something of the deeper meaning of this text.
The Sadducees ask Jesus a question which concerns one of their core beliefs: the reality of the resurrection.
I too may have uncertainties or queries about my own beliefs.
Who do I usually turn to?
Have I felt able to speak to the Lord about them?
I consider my answers and the reasons behind them Jesus replies to the Sadducees’ question.
I try to imagine the tone of his voice: is he annoyed, irritated, patient, resigned and loving or...?
Like them he uses Scripture.
I ponder: How much do I rely on Scripture to support my beliefs, to speak to others about what is important to me?
I tell the Lord how I feel about this and ask for his help if need be.
Perhaps I now stay with his assurance of eternal life.
This may lead me to reflect on people close to me who have gone to the Lord.
Is his promise able to bring me some comfort?
I tell the Lord what is in my heart.
When the time comes, I slowly bring my prayer to an end thanking him for any insights he has given me. If I can, a little later, I might want to jot down a few notes about this time of prayer.
Readings Next Week: 33rd Sunday in
Ordinary Time – Year C
First Reading: Malachi 3:19-20
Second Reading: 2 Thessalonians 3:7-12
Gospel: Luke 21:5-19
Greg Mansfield, Dale
Jenkins, Marie Knight,
Victor Slavin & ....
Tom Knight, Maurice Evans, Kathleen Kelly,
Joanne Long, Selina
Shepherd, Helena Wyllie,
Gayle Chapman & Liloy Che.
Let us pray for those whose
anniversary occurs about this time:
2nd - 8th November
Edith McCormack, Win Casey, Kevin Tolson, Annie Hood, Dean
Turnbull and Bill Stuart.
May they Rest in Peace
WEEKLY
RAMBLINGS:
During these past two weeks I have had the occasion to be
in classrooms with children from our schools talking about their faith and
life. With one group they were sharing something about their MJR (Make Jesus
Real) experience and sharing what they had learnt this year and what it would
mean for their future.
In another class I was talking about my life as a priest
when one of the children asked: ‘What makes you happy as a priest?’ It stopped
me for a moment and I asked if I could change the question slightly to ‘What
would make me happy as a priest?’ I said that what would make me happiest would
be to see each of them being their best self; to see them living what it means
to be a WEST (welcoming, encouraging, prepared to say sorry, and always giving
thanks) person all day every day; to see their families alive with the love of
God and our Parish being the best Parish in all of Tasmania as shown by our
witnessing of God’s presence in our lives.
Over the next few weeks I will be talking (in my homilies)
about what it means to be authentic as a disciple in the world today and
reflecting on the challenges that we face in living out this vocation. As well
as reflecting on this call to be a disciple I would also like to offer a
challenge to everyone today to be an intentional disciple – are you willing to
invite a family member or a friend to come and celebrate with us at our
combined Parish Mass on the 20th November at Sacred Heart, Ulverstone at 11am?
You could be taking a step of faith in daring to ask them to come to what might
be just ‘another’ Mass or it might be the opportunity for them to come and see
that our Parish wants to be different in how we do things or at least how we
are trying to do things. Whatever you decide about the challenge – I would like
you to consider seriously my invitation for you to be part of the Parish
Celebration on that day (20th Nov) for a very special celebration.
Mersey Leven Parish Community welcome
and congratulate ….
Charlotte McIver daughter of Mark
& Anna
who is being baptised this weekend.
KNIGHTS OF THE SOUTHERN CROSS NATIONAL PRAYER
CRUSADE FOR VOCATIONS:
All Catholics in Tasmania are once again invited to join
the Knights of the Southern Cross and Catholics in the Australian Defence Force
in our 10th National Prayer Crusade to pray for an increase in the
number of Catholics willing to serve the Church in the priesthood, diaconate
and religious life, (including service as Catholic Chaplains in the Australian
Defence Force).
Those participating are asked to say the special Crusade
prayer on each day of the week between Sunday 6th to Sunday 13th
November;
‘Heavenly Father, you know the faith, courage and
generosity of your people throughout Australia including the men and women
serving at home and overseas with the Australian Defence Force. Please provide
your people in Australia with sufficient Priests, Deacons and Religious to meet
their needs and be with them always as they endeavour to meet the challenges of
their daily lives. We ask this through Jesus Christ, Your Son. Amen”
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH:
As part of their sesquicentenary year events, the Sisters
of St Joseph across Victoria and Tasmania are holding a prayer service at each
of the sites where their Sisters are buried. On Thursday 10th November prayer
will be held at the Forth Catholic Cemetery (MacKillop Hill) to honour Sr
Josephine Johnson who is buried in the Fannon family grave.
Parishioners are warmly invited to join Sisters Carmel and Margaret at
11am on this day.
We
take this opportunity to express the thanks of the Parish and the Community for
the work done by Maureen Clarke as Chaplain at the Mersey Community Hospital
over many, many years. Maureen wanted to say ‘thank you’ to everyone for their
support and friendship but we thought thanking
her was more appropriate. Enjoy whatever your ‘retirement’ brings!!
EDUCATION
OF PRIESTS COLLECTION – NEXT WEEKEND:
The Education of
Priests collection enables the Archdiocese of Hobart to fund training to
seminarians. A person needs 7 years of study to become a priest. The
Archdiocese is responsible for the cost of tuition for each seminarian
throughout these years. This is paid to the Catholic Theological College. Each
students’ accommodation, food and on costs are also paid for. Envelopes for
your donation will be distributed next weekend at all Mass Centres.
ST VINCENT
DE PAUL COLLECTION:
Next weekend in
Devonport, Ulverstone, Port Sorell, Latrobe and Penguin to assist the work of
the St Vincent de Paul Society.
CALLING ALL
CHORISTERS: The next rehearsal for our next whole
Mersey Leven Parish Mass (Sunday 20th November) will be held on Wednesday
9th November at Sacred Heart Church Ulverstone at 7pm. We
need singers from all Centres of the Parish. Please email John john.leearcher@gmail.com if you need copies of the music.
CATHOLIC CHARISMATIC RENEWAL: :are sponsoring a HEALING MASS at St
Mary’s Church Penguin Thursday 24th November at 7.30pm.
All denominations are welcome to come and celebrate the liturgy. After
Mass, teams will be available for individual prayer. Please bring a friend and
a plate for supper and fellowship in the hall. If you wish to know more or
require transport, please contact Celestine Whiteley 6424:2043, Michael Gaffney 0447 018 068, Zoe Smith 6426:3073 or Tom Knaap 6425:2442.
Thursday Nights
- OLOL Hall, Devonport.
Eyes down
7.30pm! Callers for Thursday 10th November
Tony
Ryan & Terry Bird
NEWS FROM ACROSS THE ARCHDIOCESE:
Archdiocesan Website: www.hobart.catholic.org.au for
news, information and details of other Parishes.
VIGIL AND MASS OF REINTERMENT – ARCHBISHOPS TWEEDY,
YOUNG AND DARCY. (NOVEMBER 8 & 9)
Following their exhumations in September, the mortal
remains of former Archbishops Tweedy, Young and Darcy will be received into St
Mary’s Cathedral at 5pm on Tuesday November 8. The bishops will be reinterred
in the newly completed Cathedral Crypt in a ceremony commencing at 7pm on
Wednesday November 9 to which all are invited.
ST MARY’S COLLEGE OSA: will be holding their Christmas luncheon at Hellyers
Road Distillery Saturday 19th November at 12noon. All welcome! RSVP
by 11th November to Felicity Sly 6424:1933 or Lillian Hay 6428:2773
CHURCH OF
THE APOSTLES, LAUNCESTON SESQUICENTENARY: 25th
– 27th November 2016 the Launceston
Parish will be celebrating the 150th Anniversary of the Opening and Blessing of
the Church of the Apostles. Sesquicentenary Dinner at the Tailrace Centre,
Riverside on Friday 25th November at 7.00pm. Tickets are $40 and must be pre-purchased
through the Parish Office. Open Day Saturday 26th November 11.00am –
5.00pm. An Historical Display (which
includes a Commemoration of the Archbishop Guilford Young Centenary) will be
held in the Pastoral Centre with refreshments available. In the Church a Promenade of Music will be
presented with performances each half hour commencing at 2.00pm. Between the items four treasures of the
Church of the Apostles will be highlighted for those present. On Sunday 27th
November at 10.30am Archbishop Julian Porteous will be the celebrant of the
Mass of Solemn Dedication of the Church.
This will be followed by a shared lunch in Presentation Hall at Sacred
Heart School. All parishioners, friends and families associated in any way with
this magnificent Church are warmly invited to join in any or all of these
celebrations. Please contact the
Launceston Parish Office (phone: 6331:4377 or email: apostles@bigpond.com)
for more information and to register your interest in these events.
Paradox
Overcoming Contradictions
The binary,
dualistic mind cannot deal with contradictions, paradox, or mystery, all of
which are at the heart of religion. Sadly, a large percentage of religious
people become and remain quite rigid thinkers because their religion taught
them that to be faithful, obedient, and stalwart in the ways of God, they had
to seek some ideal “order” instead of growing in their capacity for love. These
are not bad people; they simply never learned much about living inside of paradox
and mystery as the very nature of faith.
Dictionaries
define a contradiction as two things that cannot be true at the same time. I
would say it this way: a contradiction is two things that cannot be true at the
same time by your present frame of logic. As long as you do not reframe your
reality, as long as you insist on your own frame of reference, you will not be
able to find the wisdom in paradox. “The kingdom of God” is Jesus’ term for the
bigger frame, or what we often call “the big picture” or “in the light of
eternity” (sub specie aeternitate). You’ve got to find some framework that
allows you to stand back and look at the moment with the eyes of Infinite Love
and Mercy. Then you’ll see that many things which appear to be contradictory
through logical, egocentric, dualistic thinking might not necessarily be so to
a nondual mind.
A paradox is
a seeming contradiction that may nonetheless be true if seen in a different
frame than my “rational” mind. The word comes from the Greek prefix para
meaning “beyond” or “outside of” and the verb dokein meaning “to appear or to
think.” A paradox is beyond the normal way of thinking. Contradictions are
based on logic, a set of assumptions or expectations which we take for granted.
Conversion—a changed mind—allows you to call those assumptions and expectations
into question. If you’re still overly attached to your ego, you normally can’t
let go of these opinions. It takes true transformation to allow you to look at
yourself from a bit of distance—with some calmness, compassion, and the
humility and honesty to know that you don’t know.
In truth, we
are all living paradoxes. No one or no thing is totally good or totally bad.
Look at Paul, for example. He was a persecutor of Jesus’ followers, maybe even
a murderer, all in the name of being a good Pharisee. Suddenly, on the road to
Damascus, he meets Christ, and the strict line between good and bad, evil and
virtue, dissolves. In that moment, the contradictions have been overcome in
him.
References:
Adapted from
Richard Rohr, Holding the Tension (an unpublished talk in Houston, Texas:
2007);
The Naked
Now: Learning to See as the Mystics See (The Crossroad Publishing Company:
2009), 36-37; and
A New Way of
Seeing . . . A New Way of Being: Jesus and Paul (CAC: 2007), discs 1 and 2 (CD,
MP3 download).
Jesus and Paul: Nondual Teachers
Simone Weil
and others have said that the very nature of spiritual truth is that it is
paradoxical. Christianity should have known this. Our very template for God is
the Trinity: Three Persons in One God. We believe Jesus is fully human and
fully divine at the same time. And Catholics believe that Mary is virgin and
mother at the same time and that the Eucharist is simultaneously bread and
Jesus. All of these are seeming contradictions. They don’t make sense to the
logical, dualistic, either/or mind. These beliefs are only understood by the
nondual, both/and mind and at the level of soul. The church has taught people
doctrines, but has not always taught the proper mind with which to understand them.
Thus the high degree of atheism, agnosticism, and “former” Catholics and
Christians.
Let me give
you some of Jesus’ and Paul’s paradoxical teachings that at first seem like
contradictions, but when you hold them both together, when you live inside of them,
“the third something” emerges. These are truths that can only be known at the
level of inner experience. They cannot be controlled at the level of the head.
When we open ourselves to paradox and mystery, we can finally be transformed at
the deepest levels. Here are just a few of Jesus’ and Paul’s seemingly
contradictory statements:
Finding is
losing; losing is finding (Luke 17:33).
The poor are
rich (Matthew 5:3); the rich are very poor (Mark 10:17-25).
Hunger is
satisfaction (Matthew 5:6); satisfaction is emptiness (Luke 12:16-21).
Weeping is
bliss; bliss is weeping (Matthew 5:4).
The wise and
learned do not understand; mere babes do (Matthew 11:25).
Folly is
wisdom; the wise are ignorant (1 Corinthians 1:18-27).
Weakness is
strength; strength is weakness (1 Corinthians 1:18-27; 2 Corinthians 12:10;
13:9).
Hold these
paradoxes in silence and your lived experience. Let them teach you true wisdom
and transform you. Holy people live inside of a very creative tension that is
held together by grace and compassion, never by logic alone.
References:
Adapted from
Richard Rohr, A New Way of Seeing . . . A New Way of Being: Jesus and Paul
(CAC: 2007), discs 1 and 2 (CD, MP3 download); and
Holding the
Tension (an unpublished talk in Houston, Texas: 2007).
Mystery Is Endless Knowability
How do we
live the contradictions? Live them—not just endure them or relieve ourselves
from the tension by quickly resolving them. The times where we meet or reckon
with our contradictions are often turning points, opportunities to enter into
the deeper mystery of God or, alternatively, to evade the mystery of God. I’m
deliberately using the word mystery to point to depth, an open future, immense
freedom, a kind of beauty and truth that can’t be fully spoken or defined.
Many mystics
speak of the God-experience as simultaneously falling into an abyss and being
grounded. This sounds like a contradiction, but in fact, when you allow
yourself to fall into the abyss—into hiddenness, limitlessness, unknowability,
a void without boundaries—you discover it’s somehow a rich, supportive,
embracing spaciousness where you don’t have to ask (or answer) the questions of
whether you’re right or wrong. You’re being held and so you do not need to try
to “hold” yourself together. Please reflect on that.
This might
be the ultimate paradox of the God-experience: “falling into the hands of the
living God” (Hebrews 10:31). When you can lend yourself to it and not fight it
or explain it, falling into the abyss is ironically an experience of ground, of
the rock, of the foundation. This is totally counterintuitive. Your dualistic,
logical mind can’t get you there. It can only be known experientially. That’s
why the mystics use magnificent metaphors—none of them adequate or perfect—for
this experience. “It’s like. . . . It’s like . . . ,” they love to say.
Mystery is
not something you can’t know. Mystery is endless knowability. Living inside
such endless knowability is finally a comfort, a foundation of ultimate
support, security, unrestricted love, and eternal care. For all of us, it takes
much of our life to get there; it is what we surely mean by “growing” in faith.
I can’t prove this to you. Each soul must learn on its own, hopefully aided by
observing other faith-filled people.
Reference:
Adapted from
Richard Rohr, Holding the Tension: The Power of Paradox (CAC: 2007), disc 3
(CD, MP3 download).
At Home in Mystery
Discernment
(1 Corinthians 12:10), rightly understood, is not choosing between a total good
and a total evil. Authentic wisdom is found at a much more subtle and
nondualistic level. It is choosing between two partial goods. If you hold both
sides seriously, within this space you can grow morally and begin to understand
what really matters. That is the space in which you can go deep and learn mystery—which
is endlessly knowable, as I wrote yesterday.
The source
of spiritual wisdom is to hold questions and contradictions patiently, much
more than to find quick certitudes, to rush to closure or judgment, as the ego
and dualistic mind want to do. The ego wants to know it is right. It wants to
stand on its own self-created solid ground—not the mysterious solid ground of
the abyss. This is why so much religion remains immature and is a hiding place
for many “control freaks” instead of people trained in giving up control to a
Loving Presence.
A mature
spiritual director will teach you how to negotiate the darkness, how to wait it
out, how to hold on, how to live in liminal or threshold space. The dualistic
mind just doesn’t know how to do that. The dualistic mind cannot deal with
paradox, but the nondual mind can. In fact, it almost relishes and revels in
mystery. Nondual consciousness is at home inside of the abyss.
I invite you
to offer a simple, full-hearted “Yes” to the moment as it is, into the whole
field, the full horizon of God and future. Choose every now in its wholeness.
Whenever you choose or allow or surrender to the now, you can hold it in its
entirety—the good and bad, the satisfying and unsatisfying, both what fulfills
and what disappoints you. Saying yes to paradox positions you in a place that
is bigger than your pain, bigger than your own thoughts. Here the Divine
Friendship holds you. This is nondual consciousness.
Reference:
Adapted from
Richard Rohr, Holding the Tension: The Power of Paradox (CAC: 2007), disc 3
(CD, MP3 download).
Faith, Hope, and Love
I want to
talk about what I mean in the practical order by holding the opposites. This is
“the third way” thinking I referenced earlier this week. The reconciling third
isn’t necessarily a third opinion. It’s much more subtle than that. The third
way acknowledges: “That is true and that is true, too, and I’ve got to learn to
coexist with both of them.” It’s not fully a third position, but a holding tank
where you recognize the truth that’s in both positions without trying to
dismiss either one of them. That’s not easy. I believe it’s uniquely the work
of the Spirit to help you “build the house of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:1) and to
hold the tension. Yet the early difficulty is that you must indeed be able to
distinguish the two positions for what they are. Third Way thinking is not
naiveté or glibly saying, “Everything is beautiful.” Jesus objectively
described the Pharisees as “white washed tombs” (Matthew 23:27) before he
taught and practiced love of enemies and forgiving seventy times seven. You see
why this takes such discernment. First, the two must be honestly named before
you can remake them into a new kind of one!
I’ve been
influenced by Carl Jung a great deal and find tremendous insight in Jungian
psychology. But let me clarify that I’m not talking about the balancing of
opposites that Jung describes (and which has its place). I’m talking about
biblical faith and hope, which is something much more subtle and difficult.
It’s not balancing or even eliminating the opposites, but holding the
opposites, as Jesus did on the cross. To live inside this space of creative
tension is the very character of faith, hope, and love—what we call the
“theological virtues.” I was taught that the theological virtues were not
virtues you could attain by effort, but only by participating in God’s own
life.
Contradictions
are not impediments to the spiritual life; rather, they are an integral part of
the spiritual life. Every highly conscious person I have met has struggled with
more than one deep contradiction. Contradictions don’t encourage you to abandon
your critical faculties, but to sharpen them.
I’d like to
point out the two great theophanies in the Bible: Moses on Mount Sinai (Exodus
19) and Jesus on Mount Tabor (Matthew 17:1-9; Mark 9:2-8; Luke 9:28-36).
Mountaintop experiences are moments of enlightenment, encounter, clarity, and
seeing. But in both cases there’s also a thick cloud. God is hidden in the
darkness of the cloud on Mt. Sinai and Jesus is overshadowed by a dark cloud on
Mt. Tabor. There’s the paradox of seeing and not seeing, knowing and not
knowing. This is what biblical faith means to me. Yet we’ve often interpreted
it as its opposite: absolute belief and certainty.
I’m not
saying that you should dismiss the two positions because they don’t matter.
That would be fuzzy relativism. It’s not that easy. I’m saying: hold the truth
of both positions and take some degree of responsibility for both positions.
Let’s bring
this to our contemporary scene. Can you be willing to honestly help carry the
shame that has been projected onto our black brothers and sisters and to
sincerely carry the responsibility that police officers feel, knowing there are
good and bad people on both sides? Note your biases and repent of them.
Reference:
Adapted from
Richard Rohr, Holding the Tension: The Power of Paradox (CAC: 2007), disc 2
(CD, MP3 download).
The Third Way
Paul is a
marvelous dialectical teacher. The word dialectic originally referred to the
Greek art of debate. A dialectic (different than our political debates) does
not move forward by either/or thinking. It’s when you play the two off of one
another and then come to a tertium quid, a third something, what the inner
wisdom traditions sometimes call “Third Force.” It is the process of overcoming
seeming opposites by uncovering a reconciling third that is bigger than both of
the parts and doesn’t exclude either of them. Such truth moves you and the
conversation to a different level. Wisdom teachers have usually taught in a
dialectical manner because they come out of inner experience, invariably tried
by immense suffering, not just outer authority.
Think of Abraham Lincoln, Mother Teresa, and Nelson Mandela.
Paul plays
off of seeming contradictions with ideas like flesh and spirit, law and
freedom, male and female—holding them both and eliminating neither, until he
gets to the reconciling third or the great spacious place called mercy or grace
which then results in a “new creation” (Galatians 6:15). But most people try to
understand Paul at the level of the initial binaries that he poses,
interpreting one as totally good and the other as totally bad. Sadly, this is
why so many people do not like Paul.
Cynthia
Bourgeault, one of our Living School core faculty members, explains the nuance
of the Third Way as follows:
The
interplay of two polarities calls forth a third, which is the “mediating” or
“reconciling” principle between them. In contrast to a binary system, which
finds stability in the balance of opposites, the ternary system stipulates a
third force that emerges as the necessary mediation of these opposites and that
in turn (and this is the really crucial point) generates a synthesis at a whole
new level. It is a dialectic whose resolution simultaneously creates a new
realm of possibility. [Italics mine]
[For
example,] as Jesus said, “unless [a seed] falls into the ground and dies, [it]
remains a single seed” [John 12:24]. If this seed does fall into the ground, it
enters a sacred transformative process. Seed, the first or “affirming” force,
meets ground, the second or “denying” force (and at that, it has to be moist
ground, water being its most critical first component). But even in this
encounter, nothing will happen until sunlight, the third or “reconciling”
force, enters the equation. Then among the three they generate a sprout, which
is the actualization of the possibility latent in the seed—and a whole new
“field” of possibility. [1]
Bourgeault
shares how Jesus brings third force to the situation of the woman caught in
adultery. When presented with the polarities of stoning the woman or freeing
her, Jesus says, “Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to
throw a stone at her” (John 8:7). Bourgeault writes: “He finds the thing that
will put the terrible two binaries in a completely new relationship and creates
a new kingdom . . . called compassion, forgiveness.” She goes on to say:
The
manifestation of love is there in the situation, but you need to find it. . . .
Third force is there because the Trinity is real, and if you are alert to it,
you will be able to find it. . . . The problem is that most of the world is
third force blind. . . . The capacity to midwife third force or holy the
reconciling is for me the most powerful fruit of a contemplative spiritual
practice. Without a contemplative practice, midwifing third force is virtually
impossible. . . . But with a spiritual practice you will be better and better equipped
to get into the dance which will allow you to see how to deliver third force in
any given situation. [2]
References:
[1] Cynthia
Bourgeault, The Holy Trinity and the Law of Three (Shambhala: 2013), 16.
[2] Cynthia
Bourgeault, The Shape of God: Deepening the Mystery of the Trinity (CAC: 2005),
disc 4 (CD, DVD, MP3 download).
Adapted from
Richard Rohr, Holding the Tension (an unpublished talk in Houston, Texas:
2007); and
A New Way of Seeing . . . A New Way of Being:
Jesus and Paul (CAC: 2007), disc 2 (CD, MP3 download).
OUR RESISTANCE TO LOVE
The original of this article by Fr Ron Rolheiser OMI can be found here
There’s nothing simple about being a human being. We’re a mystery to ourselves and often our own worst enemies. Our inner complexity befuddles us and, not infrequently, stymies us. Nowhere is this truer than in our struggle with love and intimacy.
More than anything else, we hunger for intimacy, to be touched where we are most tender, where we are most ourselves, where all that’s most precious in us lies, vulnerable and yearning. Yet, in the actual face of intimacy, sensitive people often become disquieted and resistant.
We see two powerful instances of this in the Gospels: The first in a story, recorded in all four Gospels, where a woman enters a room where Jesus is dining and, in a series of lavish gestures, breaks an expensive bottle of perfume, pours the perfume onto his feet, washes his feet with her tears, dries them with her hair, and then begins to kiss his feet. What’s the response of those in the room, save for Jesus? Discomfort and resistance. This shouldn’t be happening! Everyone shifts uncomfortably in their chairs in the face of this raw expression of love and Jesus, himself, has to challenge them to look at the source of their discomfort.
Among other things, he points out that, ironically, what they are uncomfortable with is what lies at the very center of life and at the very center of their deepest desires, namely, the pure giving and receiving of love and affection. It’s this, Jesus affirms, for which we are alive and it’s this experience which prepares us for death. It’s what we are alive for. It’s also what we most yearn for? So why our discomfort and resistance when we actually face it in life?
The second instance occurs in John’s Gospel where, at the Last Supper, Jesus tries to wash his disciples’ feet. As John records it, Jesus got up from the table, stripped off his outer robe, took a basin and towel, and began to wash his disciples’ feet. But he meets discomfort and resistance, clearly voiced by Peter who simply tells Jesus: “Never! You will never wash my feet!”
Why? Why the resistance? Why resistance in the face of the fact that, no doubt, more than anything else, what Peter most deeply desired was exactly that Jesus should wash his feet, that he would enjoy this kind of intimacy with Jesus?
Answering the question of our struggle with intimacy in this context provides one clue for why we sometimes become uncomfortable and resistant when we are in the actual face of what we desire so deeply. Our feet are too-intimate; they’re a part of our bodies where we worry about dirt and smell, not a part of ourselves that we feel comfortable having others touch. There’s an innate vulnerability, a discomfort, an inchoate shame, attached to having someone else touch and wash so intimate a part of us. Intimacy demands an ease which our vulnerability sometimes renders impossible. And so this text speaks to one kind of resistance to intimacy, to a particular unease within certain circumstances.
But Peter’s resistance here speaks too of something else, something more salient: If we are healthily and sensitive, we all will naturally experience a certain discomfort and resistance in the face of raw gift, before raw intimacy, before raw gratuity. And, while this is something to be overcome, it’s not a fault, a moral or psychological flaw on our part. On the contrary, in its normal expression, it’s a sign of moral and psychological sensitivity. Why do I say this?
Why is something that seems to block us from moving towards the very essence of life not a sign that there’s something fundamentally wrong inside of us? I suggest that it’s not a flaw but rather a healthy mechanism inside us because narcissistic, boorish, and insensitive persons are often immune to this discomfort and resistance. Their narcissism shields them from shame and their callousness allows them an easy and brute ease with intimacy, like someone who is sexually jaded enough to be comfortable with pornography or like someone who takes intimacy as something to be had by right, casually or even aggressively. In this case, there’s no shame or discomfort because there’s no real intimacy.
Sensitive people, on the other hand, struggle with the rawness of intimacy because genuine intimacy, like heaven, is not something that can be glibly or easily achieved. It’s a lifelong struggle, a give and take with many setbacks, a revealing and a hiding, a giving over and a resistance, an ecstasy and a feeling of unworthiness, an acceptance that struggles with real surrender, an altruism that still contains selfishness, a warmth that sometimes turns cold, a commitment that still has some conditions, and a hope that struggles to sustain itself.
Intimacy isn’t like heaven. It is salvation. It is the Kingdom. Thus, like the Kingdom, both the road and the gate towards it are narrow, not easily found. So be gentle, patient, and forgiving towards others and self in that struggle.
A SEASON OF GROWTH AND CHANGE
This is taken from the Pastor's Blog by Fr Michael White, of the Church of the nativity, Baltimore. the original blog can be found here
It’s a season of growth and change at Nativity, which is exactly where we believe God wants us to be.
We see the growth of our new church building day by day, as foundations are poured and walls are raised. Walking around the future lobby truly gives you the sense of what the space will feel like when complete. We’ve been blessed by some great weather recently allowing construction to move forward (mostly) on schedule. The one thing that remains consistent is the amount of meetings, on matters large and small, regarding every conceivable detail of the project. It’s actually quite a blessing that I’m able to work on this project with such creative, smart people, it truly makes all the effort enjoyable.
November always brings a very special Sunday here at Nativity, Stewardship Sunday. This year it falls on November 20. It’s the one Sunday of the year when we invite regular attendees to consider their giving to our parish. I think we do a really good job in making this presentation, as reflected in the growth in our giving. We also have some fun with the day too.
Since Starbucks just released their seasonal (green!?) cups, that must mean Christmas is coming. And it is, of course, with only three more Sundays until Advent. Of course, Christmas Eve is the day most people will be coming back to church, but attendance does increase appreciably throughout the season. So, now is a great time to begin recruiting, training, and preparing new ministers to serve. Next weekend we’re hosting a ministry push getting people to sign up and serve this holiday season.
You’ve probably heard about our Christmas at the Cow Palace, the story of how we decided to make Christmas Eve not all about the yearly push and shove fest as regulars fight with visitors for seats and parking spots. Instead, we decided to make it all about reaching the unchurched by taking our celebration off campus to the Maryland State Fairgrounds (conveniently located two miles away). There, a sea of parking surrounds a giant shed of a building, the “Cow Palace,” where we can accommodate everyone who comes to us (10,000 last year), including, most importantly, the unchurched.
But this move takes strategic planning with military precision, which starts this week and includes hundreds of people.
The irony is not lost on us, by the way, that the Church of the Nativity celebrates the Nativity in a big barn, literally.
Finally, I’d like to share the news of another transition for us as a parish. Our Director of Student Ministries, Chris Wesley, has decided to step down to pursue new opportunities in ministry. This decision is entirely Chris’ own and, after twelve years of service here, we all owe him a debt of gratitude. Of course, we are now in recruitment mode to fill this position, so if you’re interested let us know.
St Charles Borromeo
The original of this article can be found on the ThinkingFaith.org website by clicking here
Tim McEvoy marks the feast of the patron saint of spiritual directors by looking back over Borromeo’s life story and reflecting on his approach to the spiritual life.
On 4 November we celebrate the Feast of St Charles Borromeo (1538-1584), patron saint of bishops, catechists, seminarians and spiritual directors.[i] He is perhaps best known to history as the ‘hyperactive’ Archbishop of Milan who invented the confessional.[ii] He is not a saint who automatically inspires a great deal of warmth (unless, of course, you come from Milan). But who was he in life? And how did his approach to pastoral ministry compare with that of spiritual accompaniers today in the Ignatian tradition, by which Charles was influenced?
An early vocation
St Charles (or Carlo) was born into the high nobility of Renaissance Italy, growing up in the family castle of Arona by the shores of Lake Maggiore, about forty miles from Milan. He is described as being a bookish and rather serious child, made shy by a bad stammer, who had a deep love of music. He grew up somewhat in the shadow of his popular and sporty older brother, Federico, in a very pious household. His mother – who died when Carlo was nine – was known for her almsgiving and works of charity while his father spent long hours in prayer, often dressed in sackcloth, and received Communion twice a week, almost unheard of at the time.
Carlo seems to have had a very early sense of religious vocation quite independent of his family’s ambitions for him in the Church. At the age of 12 he was tonsured and appointed abbot of the lucrative family-owned Abbey of Arona. However, it is said that he insisted the revenues ‘belonged to God’ not to the Borromei and made sure that any deductions from the income were treated as ‘loans’ to be repaid to the poor.[iii] Carlo was peculiarly gifted as an organiser and administrator, verging on the obsessive compulsive, and had a very strong sense of propriety which was increasingly at odds with the unreformed worldliness he encountered in the Church.
Carlo worked hard to obtain a doctorate in civil and canon law from the University of Pavia, overcoming a breakdown following the death of his father in 1558, after which he assumed responsibility for managing the family estate and taking care of his stepmother and four younger sisters. A year later, he was catapulted into the limelight when his uncle Gian Angelo de Medici (no relation to the Florentine Medici) was elected Pope Pius IV. Overnight, enormous wealth and power was at the family’s fingertips. The young Carlo was summoned directly to Rome and appointed Administrator of the Archdiocese of Milan, amongst other prize appointments, and welcomed by 200 velvet-coated servants into sumptuous Vatican apartments. Within the space of a month he was also a cardinal and papal Secretary of State, all at only 22 years of age, with no theological training and still in minor orders. It is ironic, though perhaps not coincidental, that such a beneficiary of (literal) nepotism would go on to become one of the best-known figures of the Counter Reformation.
Trent and a Jesuit connection
His sudden rise to prominence seems only to have confirmed Carlo’s sense that God was calling him to great service in the Church. As the right-hand man of the pope he naturally took a leading role when Pius decided to re-convene the Council of Trent after a fifteen year hiatus for its third and final session (January 1562 to December 1563). Carlo effectively held the Council together in its last sessions – demonstrating remarkable skill in diplomacy despite his lack of experience – and he left a strong imprint on some of the key documents to emerge, particularly the 1566 Catechism. The style and tone of the Catholic Church after Trent was very much after Carlo’s own heart: doctrinally rigorous, liturgically standardised and administratively centralised with clear emphasis on papal primacy.
But despite the opportunities before him in Rome, Carlo’s heart was very much in Milan where he longed to carry out his true vocation: that of priest and bishop in his own diocese, following the example of his hero, St Ambrose. He was also being increasingly drawn to a life of austerity and withdrawal from the world. Discomfort with his privileged life as a prince of the Church grew after Carlo came into contact with St Philip Neri – who was to remain a lifelong friend – and the early Jesuit community in Rome, which at this time included St Francis Borgia SJ. He used to like making visits to the Jesuit house – a welcome retreat from the stress and intrigue of the Curia and Council of Trent – and he was struck by the startling contrast between their rough clothing and simple lifestyle and his own. Ignatian influence was to prove significant when Carlo came to a sudden crossroads in the form of the tragic death of his older brother from fever in November 1562.
Conversion
Family honour dictated that Carlo, as heir, now assume the headship of the Borromeo family and marry – he had after all officially only taken minor orders and even his uncle the pope was prepared to grant him a dispensation to do this. The sense of duty and weight of expectation must have been huge. It is significant that in the midst of this crisis, it was to the Jesuits that Carlo turned for help. He made the Spiritual Exercises quietly in Rome, in the process re-discovering his calling to serve God and the Church and prompting a renewed conversion. ‘God by His grace has inspired me with the strongest resolution to realise always that my greatest good is whatever comes from His hand,’ he wrote at this time.[iv] Submission to God’s will, and his own deepest desire, mattered more than family name and prosperity.[v]
One of the fruits of his conversion was the embracing of a simple lifestyle: the drastic slimming down of his cardinal’s household, the insistence that all wore the plainest clerical dress – no swords allowed – and a new regime of fasting. Despite misgivings about these new ascetical tendencies, the pope eventually gave way to his nephew’s wishes and Carlo was finally ordained priest on the Feast of the Assumption, 1563. Three years later, he was triumphantly entering Milan as its first resident archbishop in 80 years, ready to begin his life’s work of reform. The instructions he left for the preparation of his quarters at the archbishop’s palace are telling:
I wish emphatically to avoid pomp and luxury. Those prelates who are my guests will be welcomed with love and charity but all is to be modest and without worldly grandeur...Guests are to be better lodged than myself. I wish to begin in Milan as I shall continue, by living as simply as possible.[vi]
Reformer in Milan
As archbishop, Carlo was almost alarmingly driven and efficient, overseeing a wave of reforms that attempted to remove ecclesiastical abuses, raise clerical standards and reinvigorate faith amongst the laity. He imposed his own, admittedly authoritarian, vision of what the Council of Trent represented and did not retreat from clashes with Rome or with secular authority – on one occasion he excommunicated the Spanish Governor of Milan over a dispute of jurisdiction. He was the model reforming bishop of the Counter Reformation, tireless in his visitations to much neglected parishes, some of which had never even had their church consecrated. He is celebrated for establishing one of the first diocesan seminaries, maintaining strict standards of preaching and confession amongst his priests, and for founding many new schools for the poor.[vii]
Many impressive achievements, and yet the gaunt figure of this rather puritanical archbishop who disapproved of worldly pleasure (even attempting, unsuccessfully, to ban Carnival one year) does not perhaps immediately attract and inspire the modern seeker of ‘God in all things’. Borromeo drew criticism even in his day for his rigorism when it came to doctrine and there is no doubt that he could be harsh and demanding of his clergy.[viii] No more than he was harsh and demanding of himself, of course: his much-neglected health, weakened by severe penances, cut his life tragically short. Ignoring the advice of his Jesuit confessor, in his last months he continued to fast on bread and water, keep all-night vigils and to sleep on bare boards for two or three hours at most.
He died, exhausted and overworked, of a fever at the age of 46. It might be true to say that Carlo never really understood his own worth in the eyes of God and for all his love of the Spiritual Exercises of St Ignatius (he unfailingly made them once a year), never moved beyond the First Week.[ix] St Ignatius himself – who at Manresa experienced comparable scruples over his own sinfulness – later cautioned strongly against such extremes of bodily deprivation. Such impulses, he learnt, did not come from God. This experience was to help form the basis for his Rules for the Discernment of Spirits, which continue to guide Ignatian spiritual directors today. His profound mystical experiences by the Cardoner river transformed his understanding of the spiritual life and led him away from an unhealthy attachment to penance and mortification to a new vision of the Incarnate God who labours for us in creation. At Manresa, Ignatius learnt to question the model of ‘heroic sanctity’ – which had driven him since his conversion – and to rely instead on the unmerited mercy of God who accepted him as he was.
Borromeo seems not to have undergone the same transformation, which perhaps speaks more of the extremely limited spiritual formation available to him than anything else. Perhaps, too, the drivenness of this uncompromising reformer is best understood against the background of the extreme abuses he found in the Church of his day, from priests living openly with mistresses to absentee bishops growing rich on multiple benefices. He was a man of his time and an undoubtedly courageous one. He was one of the few officials who chose to remain in Milan when the plague struck in the summer of 1576, personally visiting the sick and dying in horrendous circumstances. He sought to lead his terrified priests by example, not just by fasting and preaching but by risking his own life in the service of his people: ‘We have only one life and we should spend it for Jesus Christ and souls, not as we wish, but at the time and in the way God wishes.’[x] He was known to be a generous host – notably welcoming St Edmund Campion SJ and his companions en route to their martyrdom in England in 1580 – and famously nurtured the faith of the young St Aloysius Gonzaga SJ, to whom he gave his First Holy Communion. An encourager and accompanier of others who remained faithful to his own sense of calling from God in the face of strong opposition and adversity: perhaps these are not bad qualities in the end for a patron saint of pastors and spiritual directors?
Tim McEvoy, Ph.D, is a spiritual director and a member of the retreat team at St Beuno's Jesuit Spirituality Centre in North Wales.
[i] We could perhaps add ‘letter-writer’ to his portfolio as, alongside Erasmus and St Ignatius, he ranks as one of the great correspondents of his age: there are over 30,000 extant letters in the Ambrosian Library in Milan.
[ii] Diarmaid MacCulloch, Reformation: Europe’s House Divided, 1490-1700 (Penguin, 2004), p. 98.
[iii] Margaret Yeo, A Prince of Pastors: St Charles Borromeo (London, New York and Toronto, 1938), pp. 26-27.
[iv] Cited in Yeo, A Prince of Pastors, p. 79.
[v] Interestingly, Borromeo was to have a Jesuit confessor for the rest of his life. He insisted that all aspirants to his household and recipients of clerical appointments in Milan first make the Spiritual Exercises. (Ibid, pp. 111; 227.)
[vi] Letter to his Vicar General, Nicolò Ormaneto, cited in ibid, p. 97.
[vii] By the end of his life there were an incredible 740 schools in Milan serving around 40,000 pupils. (MacCulloch, Reformation, p. 412.)
[viii] Ibid, pp. 411-12.
[ix] Yeo, A Prince of Pastors, p. 227.
[x] Cited in ibid, p. 197
No comments:
Post a Comment